The South Could Not Win the Civil War :: American America History

The southeasterly Could Not Win the Civil WarThe South could never render won the Civil War, is a true statement, reflecting the various ways in which the Southern states attempted to fight a losing battle from the mystifyning. The economic dependency of the South on cotton on slavery was obvious, whereas the North had diversified and sufficiently. The advantage also lay with the North for reasons such as better communication and transportation, and regular(a) much soldiers. The leadership in the North under Abraham Lincoln was far superior to the less savvy Jefferson Davis. It is also a fair argument to arrange that the just cause always overcomes, and morally, slavery was not just at all. In the 1850s the North was more populous and urban, due to all the Irish and German immigrants that traveled to the states. By1860, 9 out of the 10 biggest cities were in the North. The North also had 70% of the railroads, and more telegraph lines to send messages instantly. The North had a lot more industry also, with its 10,000 factories that brought in $1.5 billion dollars in goods compared to the Souths 20,000 that brought in $155 million.(Source 1) The South did, however, have more slaves and more cotton. This was not any sort of military advantage, and yet made it more obvious to the North how desperate the South was to keep its peculiar institution running. Additionally, the first attack at Fort Sumter was poorly organized and was expected by the North. Lincoln had wanted to attack, but waited so as to retain the sympathies of any Northern moderates. The Souths attack played into what he wanted. Once the warfare began, the military expertise of Ulysses S. Grant for the North made it an uphill battle for the South. His military skill alone was enough to give Robert E. Lees forces in the South life-threatening problem, but the Union army also greatly outnumbered the Souths troops. Though Lee would prove to be a worthy general, his strategic downfall at Gettysbu rg would begin the inevitable loss for the South. (Source 2) In conclusion, it was obvious from the beginning of the Civil War that the South would not win the war. This having been said, Robert E. Lee was a fine general, but was exactly without enough soldiers to lead a successful uprising.

What September 11, 2001 Has Meant To Me :: September 11 Terrorism Essays

On September 11, 2001 our Nation sat and watched in fear and offense as unknown assailants attacked the American people on our own soil, a feat that has not been seen since World War II. The atrocities of this day have evoked an copiousness of overwhelming emotions that have spread throughout the world like wild fire. The diversity of my emotions is still pulling me in several different directions, making it ambitious for me to place a meaning to September 11, 2001. I like the rest of America watch as countries throughout the world lend support and attending to our country. I watch these events unfold with great pride and relief as foreign nations bond in concert and aid us in order to force a common foe. If nothing else good comes out of this atrocity at least we have proved that the majority of this world can come together and work as one.My pride at watching this world come together is not totally felt as I observe our post front. I have spent my entire life traveling this w orld and for the past ten years have continued that travel as a member of the U.S. Navy. My one regret is the fact that at times I am embarrassed to call myself an American, for in no other country does it possess over four thousand deaths and mass destruction for a people to find pride in their Nation. I am disgusted with our Nations sudden fast(a) values and ashamed. What have we been teaching our children for the past twenty years? As with so many others my strongest emotion is fear. Fear for what we are getting into and fear that our impudently found Americans will prove history right. This is a war to the likes that no one has ever seen and I dont think Americans, to no stigma of their own, realize the true extent of what we are dealing with. I have learned and experienced so many things as a member of the arm forces. It is this knowledge that every sailor and soldier alike has that allows me to see just how horrific this war could be.

Tobacco Companies Targeting Young People :: Free Essay Writer

Tobacco Companies Targeting Young PeopleThesis Statistics show us that young slew are the main target of the tobaccocompanies. traceI. IntroductionII. Two main companiesIII. Tobacco industries claimsVI. Other problemsV. Stopping them from smokingVI. Conclusion     Every day, 3,000 kids start smoking, most of them between the ages of 10and 18. These kids add up to 90 percent of all new smokers (Roberts 38). Thesestatistics show us that young people are the main targets of the tobaccocompanies. The cigarette manufacturers will deny it, hardly advertising andpromotion play a very important part in making these statistics a reality.     The two main companies in this advertising fight are Marlboro and Camel.Marlboro uses a western cowboy called the Marlboro Man, while Camel uses JoeCamel, a hip cartoon character. Everywhere you go there is billboards or someother var. of advertisement on these two shady characters. When I say shady, Iimply tha t these characters are not proficient figures we see but they are traps justwaiting to lure the next victim in. As kids look through magazines and see JoeCamel driving a cool car and surrounded by bonny women they get the ideathat in order to be somebody they need to smoke a Camel cigarette. It is notright to prey on young people just because they are unaware of the dangers ofsmoking.     The tobacco industry denies that these symbols target people less than21 and claim that their advertising goal is simply to promote place switchingand loyalty. Many people disagree with this statement such as Illinois Rep.Richard Durbin who said "If we can reduce the number of young smokers, thetobacco companies will be in trouble and they know it"(Roberts 38).     The problem we are facing is not only with the tobacco companies butwith the young people also. The reason why I say this is because most youthsknow that they are being targeted. If thes e kids realize that the advertising ismanipulating them, why do they still smoke? The ads reflect an image ofrebellion and competent in. These are all the things a young person, betweenchildhood and adolescence, needs and desires. This type of advertising, on topof peer pressure, is the mystery behind the rise in adolescent smoking.     How do we stop the future of America from smoking? Here are three thingsthat the experts recommend. Try to convince your children that smoking is notcool. Talk to your kids at a young age about the dangers of smoking. Identifyfamily members who smoke and ask them to stop (Thomas 450).